The genius of apostle john in the context of theological foundation

Related Topics A polymath talent, Albert Schweitzer made major scholarly contributions to music and biblical studies in the early years of the twentieth century. His decision to abandon an academic career to seek a more practical way of serving his fellow human beings as a medical missionary in Africa inspired many people to support his efforts and resulted in a legacy of humanitarian service that is still active today. His father, Louis Schweitzer, was pastor to a Lutheran congregation at Kaysersberg. Schweitzer, by his own admission, enjoyed a happy childhood and adolescence Schweitzer, b,

The genius of apostle john in the context of theological foundation

But given the copious amount of work on the subject, my view is that those of us interested in the study of Paul and the Pauline epistles might better orient ourselves in the surfeit of scholarship through the identification, or production, of a taxonomic framework to the study of Paul. It is here, in the theoretical area of Pauline studies, or perhaps the space of discourse analysis and Pauline studies, that my interest lies.

Now admittedly, there are a great number of facets that need to be considered in order to produce a cogent framework. To outline but just a few these: See also Richard I. Pervo, The Making of Paul: Constructions of the Apostle in Early Christianity Minneapolis: Sanders, Paul and Palestinian Judaism: A Comparison of Patterns of Religion Philadelphia: See also Mark D.

Nanos and Magnus Zetterholm, eds.

Baker Academic Reformation History Collection (6 vols.) - Logos Bible Software

Paul within 1 e. Indeed, this last overarching project is surely the most ubiquitous, and is, in most instances, connected in some fashion to the various other approaches or categories mentioned.

But none of these are my focus here. Rather, the category that I wish to address is one that I think lurks implicitly in the work of some Pauline exegetes. At its core, it is a category that identifies in Paul — and by extension the epistles attributed to him — an impermeable, or inextricably enigmatic element.

While the letter is widely held to be a late first, or even early second-century composition Judaism: Augsburg Fortress Publishers, Trinity Press International, A Commentary on the Letter to the Romans, trans.

The genius of apostle john in the context of theological foundation

Stanford University Press, See also Alain Badiou, Saint Paul: The Foundation of Universalism, trans. Winter, After Paul Left Corinth: Oxford University Press, It should also be recognized, however, that we have no knowledge of which Pauline letters the author of 2 Peter was referring to — consequently, one should be wary of simply assuming that the author was referencing the same collection of Pauline epistles as what we find in the New Testament today.

Kraftchick, Jude and 2 Peter Nashville: Abingdon Press, In terms of dating, Kelly dates the authorship of the epistle to CE Given the overall context of 3: Fortress Press, See Wayne Meeks, ed.

The Writings of St. Albert Schweitzer is a notable exception in this regard. Schweitzer, in the course of presenting an account of nineteenth and early twentieth-century scholarship on Paul, makes a poignant observation that points in the general direction of the category I wish to elicit here: The odd thing is that [Pauline scholars] write as if they understood what they were writing about.

The genius of apostle john in the context of theological foundation

They never call attention to the fact that the Apostle always becomes unintelligible just at the moment when he begins to explain something; never give a hint that while we hear the sound of his words the tune of his logic escapes us. A Critical History, trans.

Adam and Charles Black, Yet having reached this conclusion, Schweitzer proceeded for better or worse along the same path, ultimately producing an image of Jesus as an eschatological figure though this is not to suggest that production of Jesus as an eschatological figure is lacking in cogency or not persuasive.

Paul D. Adams

Many years after publishing Paul and His Interpreters, Schweitzer produced another work, The Mysticism of Paul the Apostle, which presents Paul — like Jesus — in a predominantly eschatological light.

The only difference is the hour in the world-clock in the two cases. ARC Black,The Genius of Luther’s Theology is a fresh and innovative examination of the heart of Luther’s theology. This book makes Luther more understandable and thus more usable for readers of all levels. This book makes Luther more understandable and thus more usable for readers of all levels.

John's Gospel is the mature reflections of the last living apostle. John the apostle wrote this book approximately fifty-five years after the resurrection of Jesus. During those years he had reflected on the words and deeds of Jesus and the result is that the pages of the Gospel contain the seasoned thinking of one of Jesus' closest friends.

Jesus clearly saw Abel's death as an act of martyrdom (Matthew ), as does the apostle John (1 John ). John explains that Abel's death was because Cain's acts . A Theology of the Letters to Timothy and Titus: The Christian Life Life between Two Epiphanies According to Paul’s teaching in the letters to Timothy and Titus, Christians live between two epiphanies or appearances of Jesus Christ: his first coming and his second coming.

Generally speaking, the Gospel of Jesus Christ, or the message of salvation, justification, and sanctification, is explained by the apostle Paul in his epistle to the Romans, especially in chapters 3 to Christian writers and teachers often present the Good News set within the context of .

If you really want to understand the genius, the fullness of Christian experience, then I have some secret teaching that is not normally understood in the context of Christian churches planted by the Apostle .

Paula Fredriksen » Department of Religion | Boston University