Summary The poet T. Eliot offers us a way of experiencing and interpreting the interplay of our personal and social worlds: For all of us — whether or not we love poetry, and whether or not we see the world through the eyes of Christian faith — Eliot offers us a fruitful and holistic way of thinking about our world Introduction T. If you happen to be reading this paper while hanging from a strap on the Central or Piccadilly lines, or cheek by jowl on the number 17 bus, then Eliot would have had the same experience about 90 years ago.
Eliot's The Waste Land Essay introduction. Eliot wrote The Waste Land inas a response to the devastation he saw in society in the wake of World War 1. Critics at the time were divided: One aspect of the poem that has never been disputed is the fragmentation that exists within it, and it is this that I intend to concentrate my essay on.
Eliot, though he never openly chose to admit it, was influenced by the Imagist group of poets which included Eliot close friend, Ezra Poundwho practised the theory that art should be made up of Images, not a lengthy description of feelings: We will write a custom essay sample on Fragmentation in T.
In The Waste Land, however, he went beyond the Imagist technique: With the release of the original manuscript to the poem ininformation to back up this idea of fragmentation in all aspects of The Waste Land came to light: It is doubtful whether that editing had any real influence on the coherence of the narrative structure, however, as presumably the fragments that were removed had no real thread of plot and consistency running through them.
Fragmentation is present in almost every aspect of The Waste Land. In the first instance, it affects the narrative voice of the poem: The continuous change in narrative voice highlights the fragments of images that make up The Waste Land, yet it also provides a link, some common ground, between the different sections: Just as the one-eyed merchant, seller of currants, melts into the Phoenician Sailor, and the latter is not wholly distinct from Ferdinand Prince of Naples, so all women are one woman, and the two sexes meet in Tiresias.
What Tiresias sees, in fact, is the substance of the whole poem. The fragmentation in the poem extends to the poetic form of the poem.
However, on closer examination it is clear that within this free verse Eliot employs short bursts of structure, partly as a homily to the poetic works of the past. Also in this section, Eliot plays on the traditional Petrarchan sonnet form lines when describing the interlude between the typist and the clerk, possibly as an attempt to romanticize the crude and uninvolved sexual encounter that comes to pass.
It is only the final line that breaks with the traditional rhyme scheme of the sonnet. He continues through the poem with more references from Shakespeare, Middleton, Milton, Spenser, Marvell, alongside older writer such as Ovid.
It is not only excerpts from the work of his predecessors and contemporaries that Eliot uses, however; he also relies heavily on religious texts and images, and ancient myths.
Many critics at the time were divided on the matter: However, it is not as though Eliot used the quotations and misquotations to carry their original meaning: The allusions are often so subtle, containing perhaps only two words, that even if a reader does not register them, he can carry on reading the poem regardless.
Tereus, the King, rapes Philomel, his sister in law, before cutting out her tongue to stop her from telling anyone what has happened. However, she weaves the story of her plight into a tapestry to tell her sister, Procne, what has happened.
The sisters then gain revenge on Tereus, by killing his son and feeding him to Tereus.Modern culture, as envisaged by T.S. Eliot, is irredeemably fractured. In the years following the First World War, when The Waste Land was written, many of the old certainties had vanished. The.
He remade poetry for the modern age, and what he does with language and form has rarely if ever been surpassed.
To stop and read the top Eliot poems is to experience something extraordinary, that will not admit of the shallow but speaks for a world that is coherent and true and beautiful, even in what Eliot saw as the wreckage of contemporary life. The Waste Land is an incredibly complex poem, that may appear to lack coherence.
Its extensive use of allusions to convey narrative and understanding, its heavily fragmented structure and its various dislocated narratives all give an impression of detachment, frustration and fragmentation. Fragmentation and Coherence in The Waste Land T.S. Eliot’s The Waste Land is an intricate poem that is intentionally difficult to understand; it contains a myriad of allusions to other texts, it has a fragmented narrative structure, speaks in various languages and utilizes surreal imagery.
Fragmentation in T.S. Eliot's The Waste Land Essay. T - Fragmentation in T.S. Eliot's The Waste Land Essay introduction. S. Eliot wrote The Waste Land in , as a response to the devastation he saw in society in the wake of World War 1.
T.S. Eliot’s Powerful Use of Fragmentation in The Waste Land T.S. Eliot’s The Waste Land is an elaborate and mysterious montage of lines from other works, fleeting observations, conversations, scenery, and even languages.